http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gM95HHI4gLk
, Kahn describes learners using these videos in ways that put the control in
their hands, making this a clear example of Web 2.0 technology. For example with the videos, he talks about learners pausing
and replaying concepts to give them time to review and check anything they don’t
understand, going back to earlier videos to review concepts without the
embarrassment of asking their tutor, avoiding interruption by the tutor while
a student is still concentrating on understanding a new idea, and letting students work in at a time and location that is comfortable - at their own pace and without time limits.
Khan describes what teachers have called “flipping the
classroom” where students watch the videos for homework and then practice using
what they have learned in the classroom. This supports peer interaction and
helps position a tutor (in a classroom) as providing individualised coaching
for students rather than as a ‘one size fits all’ presenter.
Khan has found that the videos have been used by children and
adults.
Having reviewed some of the
videos, I think that while they are strong on maths content, they are fairly weak
on providing context, or how the maths concepts being taught might apply in the
real world or be transferred. Context is
particularly important for adult learners who are often learning maths for
wider reasons, such as managing a budget or training for a qualification. That said, maths is the one subject where
people seem more comfortable with learning decontextualised skills and
knowledge and transferring these to real situations (although, this is still a
challenge). It is also possible that the
Khan material is well aligned with the school assessment system and as such,
the testing of decontextualised skills and knowledge is the context.
Daniel Rezac, a reviewer from edreach, is one of the few public
commentators who has identified some limitations with the Kahn videos and
activities. http://edreach.us/2011/03/15/khan-academy-great-idea-with-one-glaring-hole/
. In particular he thinks that the
videos are boring, and that is a there isn’t enough teaching of concepts (especially
in the new Khan Application), “The
Khan Academy is not teaching concepts and ideas. Khan Academy teaches answers.
1 + 1 = 2. The concepts and the ideas are really what we want our students to
understand, not the rote knowledge. We need a good teacher to facilitate the
discussion of what the concept of numbers can be.” (p.1). Rezac does support the idea of online math
lessons as it gives students access to their teacher's thinking anytime and
anywhere, however, he wants to see more teachers developing their own online
resources. In considering the
success of the Khan Academy he states that the “ Khan Academy is a symptom of a teaching profession
where too many teachers are too shy or too old-school to jump into the
publishing world.” (p.2).
The
popularity of the Khan Academy is huge (over 1 million students per month watch
over 200,000 videos a day). He has tapped into a desire and need from learners
for improved maths teaching opportunities and the flexibility and reach
provided by the internet. While this popularity may reflect a huge need for flexible, accessable online maths instruction, it may also reflect an absence of choice. At the same
time, I congratulate Khan for pioneering an approach that many learners have found enjoyable and that I think will encourage
teachers and learners to make wider use of Web 2.0 opportunities.
Here are a
couple of Khan videos if you haven’t seen them before:
Wow!! this could be your direction for your assignment 3!! You have not only described an application but also have gone into critiquing it.
ReplyDeleteReflection and critical thinking are important aspects of Assignment 3 and this blog takes such an approach. You might like to go into APA6th and see how you can reference videos- a small challenge for you.
Keep up the blogging.